Select Page

Arundel Partners Case Solution

Problem identification:

They would be occupied with purchasing the sequel rights for at least one studio. In addition to this, there would be complete production over an extended time of at least a year. It could be said that for example if a film becomes a hit and that Arundel thinks that making a sequel of the said film would be profitable, then it is possible that it would practice its rights by producing a sequel. On the other hand, they could offer the rights to the most important buyers. Inevitably, the execution of the first movies would not legitimize continuations, and for them, the spin-off rights would necessarily not work out. For most motion pictures, it has turned out to be very clear after their initial couple of weeks in theaters whether the sequel would be prudent or not based upon the film industry implementation.

It is of fundamental significance to Arundel that various movies and the cost for every film are settled upon before either Arundel or the studio become aware of which movies would create a choice of a spin-off. Furthermore, once the generation would begin, the studio would frame a sentiment regarding the motion picture and the likeliness that a spin-off would be conceivable. This would put Arundel off guard since it would then need to arrange the cost for spin-off rights on every film delivered while knowing a great deal not exactly about the generation studio but regarding the movie.

Investigation of Arundel's proposition incorporates a net present value computation of every motion picture organization. Arundel feels that holding up to purchase the continuation rights until after the film goes into production will make it more troublesome and exorbitant to purchase the rights. The following are the points of interest and hindrances of the approach.


  • All variable data was used, as well as there was a large sample in the analysis, as a result, our data would lead to a more accurate conclusion.
  • The company did not eliminate any outlier because it felt that outlier is the characteristic of the industry.
  • The analysis is based on historical data rather than fabricated assumptions.
  • The breaking down of the data by the studio is an advantage because it provides direction.


  • It is assumed that historical performance is inductive of future fulfillment in the short term based on historical data. It is expected that all the companies perform similarly over the period of time.
  • Only one-year historical data is available.
  • Motion picture creating organizations will offer continuation rights under the terms.
  • Probabilities of success have been calculated, however the company has not been able to apply them to a per film value. It has been identified that it is important to be subjective regarding the hazard in light of the probabilities of progress.

Option embedded in the sequel rights:

Arundel would like to escape the threat of creating a film in the motion picture industry at the cost of purchasing the alternative to deliver potentially active spin-offs. Additionally, tastes are flighty, and expecting the success of any film was practically impossible. Hence, Arundel utilized an inventive method for dealing with this risk by just obtaining spin-off rights to movies even before the organization launched such movies due to which the management went ahead to make spin-offs for the currently active films.


Arundel has bought an arrangement of spin-off rights from at least one noteworthy studio. It is presumably because Arundel does not have the fundamental information in identifying, which motion picture would end up being beneficial and would have the possibility of being continued. Without this learning, Arundel needs to expand and purchase the entire arrangement of continuation rights from different studios to ensure the rights of any successful movies in the future.

This expansion of procurement of continuation rights with a different cost for each movie additionally does not have any requirements for the future arrangements of estimations of spin-off rights with studios. This is particularly useful as Arundel evaded the revolting circumstance of the studios charging higher costs for spin-off rights when they decided that the current film underway was going to be successful.

Discounted cash flows:

Marked down income approach is a typical strategy to approve a financial resource by using the idea of timing estimation of money. It is employed here to help us evaluate the spin-off rights.

Arundel would purchase the whole example size of 99 films with the expectations of acquiring more compelling movies due to the lack of learning of the decision of successful films. Since the costs accumulated negative value and income received net inflows with the original film are not credited to Arundel, therefore they would be of no value in the estimation of continuation rights using the marked down money streams approach................................................

This is just a sample partial case solution. Please place the order on the website to order your own originally done case solution.

Share This